TORONTO - He may not have fired the shot that killed 15-year-old Jane Creba, but by participating in a reckless shootout that sent a hail of gunfire through a street teeming with Boxing Day shoppers, the first man to stand trial in the case must bear responsibility for her death, a jury found Sunday.
Creba's 2005 death sent waves of outrage rippling through Toronto and beyond with dismay over the random shooting of the bright young girl on downtown Toronto's busiest street in the waning hours of the busiest shopping day of the year.
The now 20-year-old man, who can only be identified as J.S.R. because he was under 18 at the time, remained stoic after the jury found him guilty of second-degree murder, two of six counts of aggravated assault and five weapons charges.
The Crown exchanged hugs and huge smiles, while the defence was incredulous. Lawyer Mara Greene's tear-stained face spoke volumes about their utter shock.
Outside court, lawyer Gary Grill said "in our combined experiences as defence lawyers, Ms. Greene and I, we've never, ever, ever had a stronger defence case."
They will "obviously" be appealing, he said.
"We maintain our client's innocence and we will not stop fighting as far as we can go in order to make sure that everyone knows that he indeed is innocent."
The defence called no evidence, but in his closing remarks Grill said the Crown's allegations defied common sense.
The Crown alleged the group of men J.S.R. was with that day escalated a confrontation with another man, Jeremiah Valentine, by pulling guns out, which prompted Valentine to allegedly fire the first shot.
One of the shots that came from Valentine's gun is the one that killed Creba, piercing her back and exiting her body at the base of her throat, the Crown said.
In her closing arguments, Crown attorney Kerry Hughes likened it to street racing, and the courts have said if one driver involved in a street race kills a bystander, both drivers are guilty.
Three guns were fired that day: Valentine's .357, a .25-calibre pistol and a 9-mm Ruger.
Though J.S.R. was arrested carrying the 9-mm gun, the defence argued that another man, Louis Woodcock, was the one who fired shots with that gun, then handed it off to a naive and underage J.S.R.
The Crown alleged J.S.R. took Woodcock's gun and began shooting after Valentine fired the first shot.
The fact that Woodcock brought the gun downtown that day and had it when the shooting began was in the agreed statement of facts and apparently gave the jury trouble, as they went back to the judge with a question about it.
Valentine, Woodcock, five other adults and one youth are charged with either second-degree murder or manslaughter in the case and are expected to stand trial next year.
As the jury's deliberations dragged into a fourth day, many began to wonder if the jury of 11 people (one was excused for personal reasons) would in fact be able to reach a unanimous verdict.
"Of course as time went on we all started thinking, as everybody else here did, as to which way it was going to go," lead investigator Det.-Sgt. Savas Kyriacou said
"(But) I knew what the right thing was and I knew that ultimately they would come up with the right decision."
The defence, however, was stunned.
"I can't explain this jury's verdict," Grill said. "Most of the observers can't explain this jury's verdict. It really is confounding for us."
In his closing arguments last week Grill urged the jury not to let anger over Creba's senseless death cloud their judgment, but outside court Sunday he suggested that's exactly what happened.
"That's obviously what goes through our heads right now, but I don't know and we'll never know what this jury was thinking," Grill said.
Kyriacou said he knew the jury would make the right decision.
He said he spoke with the Crebas and they are also satisfied with the verdict.
When Kyriacou heard the word guilty in the courtroom he said many things went through his head, but primarily the young girl who was shot while shopping with her sister then lay dying on the cold street that day.
"We've been thinking about Jane since Dec. 26, 2005," he said.
"We always think about Jane and I'm sure anyone that's a parent or has siblings or loved ones would also think about her."
A date for sentencing will be set on Thursday.
Creba's 2005 death sent waves of outrage rippling through Toronto and beyond with dismay over the random shooting of the bright young girl on downtown Toronto's busiest street in the waning hours of the busiest shopping day of the year.
The now 20-year-old man, who can only be identified as J.S.R. because he was under 18 at the time, remained stoic after the jury found him guilty of second-degree murder, two of six counts of aggravated assault and five weapons charges.
The Crown exchanged hugs and huge smiles, while the defence was incredulous. Lawyer Mara Greene's tear-stained face spoke volumes about their utter shock.
Outside court, lawyer Gary Grill said "in our combined experiences as defence lawyers, Ms. Greene and I, we've never, ever, ever had a stronger defence case."
They will "obviously" be appealing, he said.
"We maintain our client's innocence and we will not stop fighting as far as we can go in order to make sure that everyone knows that he indeed is innocent."
The defence called no evidence, but in his closing remarks Grill said the Crown's allegations defied common sense.
The Crown alleged the group of men J.S.R. was with that day escalated a confrontation with another man, Jeremiah Valentine, by pulling guns out, which prompted Valentine to allegedly fire the first shot.
One of the shots that came from Valentine's gun is the one that killed Creba, piercing her back and exiting her body at the base of her throat, the Crown said.
In her closing arguments, Crown attorney Kerry Hughes likened it to street racing, and the courts have said if one driver involved in a street race kills a bystander, both drivers are guilty.
Three guns were fired that day: Valentine's .357, a .25-calibre pistol and a 9-mm Ruger.
Though J.S.R. was arrested carrying the 9-mm gun, the defence argued that another man, Louis Woodcock, was the one who fired shots with that gun, then handed it off to a naive and underage J.S.R.
The Crown alleged J.S.R. took Woodcock's gun and began shooting after Valentine fired the first shot.
The fact that Woodcock brought the gun downtown that day and had it when the shooting began was in the agreed statement of facts and apparently gave the jury trouble, as they went back to the judge with a question about it.
Valentine, Woodcock, five other adults and one youth are charged with either second-degree murder or manslaughter in the case and are expected to stand trial next year.
As the jury's deliberations dragged into a fourth day, many began to wonder if the jury of 11 people (one was excused for personal reasons) would in fact be able to reach a unanimous verdict.
"Of course as time went on we all started thinking, as everybody else here did, as to which way it was going to go," lead investigator Det.-Sgt. Savas Kyriacou said
"(But) I knew what the right thing was and I knew that ultimately they would come up with the right decision."
The defence, however, was stunned.
"I can't explain this jury's verdict," Grill said. "Most of the observers can't explain this jury's verdict. It really is confounding for us."
In his closing arguments last week Grill urged the jury not to let anger over Creba's senseless death cloud their judgment, but outside court Sunday he suggested that's exactly what happened.
"That's obviously what goes through our heads right now, but I don't know and we'll never know what this jury was thinking," Grill said.
Kyriacou said he knew the jury would make the right decision.
He said he spoke with the Crebas and they are also satisfied with the verdict.
When Kyriacou heard the word guilty in the courtroom he said many things went through his head, but primarily the young girl who was shot while shopping with her sister then lay dying on the cold street that day.
"We've been thinking about Jane since Dec. 26, 2005," he said.
"We always think about Jane and I'm sure anyone that's a parent or has siblings or loved ones would also think about her."
A date for sentencing will be set on Thursday.
Crime Is Commerce !
15 year old Jane Creba , a grade 10 student , was gunned down in a hail of bullets nearly two years ago. Six others were injured.
Nine young men were charged in the murder, all have gang ties.
Jane was a good student and a sports star in her high school . Mr. and Mrs. Creba have been brave and patient during this whole ordeal. Jane was their only child .
Sa Again Wallycrawler .
12 Don't Just Sit There Say Sumthin !:
wtf is going on over there in Canada???? need first hand infos!
Well D.M. it's mostly the city of Toronto that's go'n to the dogs.
And the way the economy is, this area in particular, wont see an abrupt change in gang warfare and deaths. Certain areas in Toronto in the East & the West ends are shooting galleries! And forget about downtown, that's lost cause now...Nobody shops there anymore, except the sellect few.
As a mater of fact I see a huge increase in violence incurring in Toronto, Regina, Winnipeg, Vancouver, Montreal, Calgary, Edmonton... Every major city in Canada!
But mostly in Toronto and the GTA (Greater Toronto Area). Layoffs in the auto industry will collapse the economy and start a rise in crime. Cities like Oshawa, Burlington, Oakville...will become ghost towns. Much like Hamilton. has become.
Toronto is the future Buffalo or Detroit.
eye for an eye. People can not, could not and will not be able to regulate their drug use if legalized. They would kill themselves off though. We just need to quit caring....we save corpses that should have been let go all the time. These people don't want to be saved...when are we gonna get it? Survival of the fittest...in moderation of course.
R.I.P you beautiful young girl.
Hey Heather.
I don't really think the amount of drug use will go up. Maybe for the first year because of the novelty?
But after that nah!
Drug addicts chose they're lifestyle out of laziness, style, and the sheer drabness of their lives. Some also use to suppress childhood memories.
But we can't live our lives through the suffering of others. Also those people shouldn't do the same to us!
They have'ta grow up, face their demons or face the consequences.
__________________________________
She really was a beautiful lil' girl eh Princess?
I invite all readers to find out about how special this child was.
She was lost on fear and bloated egos!
Enforce the laws that are on the books to the fullest extent. These kids/adults that are gang banging over drugs and turf, laugh at the laws right now becuase scum bag lawyers get them off all the time. That includes both sides of the border. IMO we need to bring back capital punishment for murder. At the same time dont let them appeal for 20 years and also make it public when we off someone. Get real tough for the nasty stuff and get back to justice from 200 years ago. If you rape someone, you get neutered or worse. If you steal, off with your hand, etc, etc. Law abiding Citizens have nothing to worry, about its only the criminals that should worry.
Until we, as a society, wake up and smell the coffee it will be business as ususal for gangs and everyday criminals.
I have a CCW permit and carry my1911 45 caliber handgun when ever possible. Defend yourself people, dont become a statistic or the front page news.
I do have an answer to your statement Rainman, but...
Has anyone noticed the hits I'm get'n from "Denise Austin", shit she's popular!
She's way hawt! She's way in her 40's now too!!!
Denise Austin = Ratings. Bloggers Take notice!!!
________________________________
Rainman I have guns too.
I've been trained with guns and been shot'n a 303 since I was 13. I also was give'n a over under when I was 15.
I've shot hand guns before, but don't want or need to ever have them around.
My hands/feet/head are my weapons!
If anyone's stupid enough to use a hand gun in rage or during a stupid drug turf war, they should be given the maximum sentence...That should = death!
Its so very sad but it keeps happening all the time. WHY is my qn!
Keshi.
We have a pretty liberal drug 'law' here. Maybe you read about it.
Marjhuana is not really legal (from the view of the law)... but with a small amount or home grown you normally would come away without any problems.
For addicts of hard drugs we have special programs (officially from the government!) where they get drugs, shelter and medical aid. Sounds crazy, I know. But in the end it's much cheaper and safer then dealing with crime, illness and all the pain. So if you give them better posibilities to 'land in a safe net' more and more are able to come back into a 'normal' life.
More police, more laws, more prisons is NOT the way to go. I agree with wally, legalize drugs. Decriminalize
America (and with it most of the world) is off the cliff. Unfortunately ultra violance will be all around us daily.
Time to step close together.
Keshi if you want the answer to that question watch the "Zeitgeist Movie".
__________________________________
Our drug laws go up and down with the wind. We have no drug law that's in effect. Some guy will get the book thrown at'em for a small amount of coke, yet a major marijuana bust will get ya noth'n!
Most people don't wanna hear about this, especially "dopers", but coke has less side effects than pot, easier of the system in low doses, and less habit forming...Plus they're less deaths from coke in the criminal world than pot. Dope is a huge business in the west coast. So huge the taxes that would be generated would pay for all of Canada's heath care system!
It's time we all growed up, don'tcha think?
__________________________________
Handmaiden we could go back to the vigilante dayz. You know the days we all long for with the KKK lead'n us to freedom?
Post a Comment